University students always focus on one specialist subject, but some people think universities should encourage their students to study a range of subjects in addition to their own subject. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

大学生总是专注于一个专业科目，但有些人认为大学应该鼓励学生学习除了自己的专业之外的知识。你在多大程度上同意或不同意这种说法？

Before elaborating my perspective about whether universities should teach students to be vertically or horizontally developed, I feel necessary to categorize higher education into two spans: the one for Associate or Bachelor Degree, and the one for Master as well as Ph.D.

在阐述我的观点是否大学应该教学生是垂直或水平的发展，对高等教育分为两跨，我觉得有必要：为大专或本科学历的人，并为硕士以及博士学位。

As to the first one, the institutions of higher education, I consider, are more suggested to structure a teaching package covering a wide range of curricula. It is quite common that the generality of students in this stage are not sure about the professions they are genuinely curious about or talented in. Therefore, more choices of disciplines should be given to them for comparison and selection.

作为第一个，高等教育院校，我认为，更建议结构教学计划覆盖的范围广泛的课程。这是很常见的，在这个阶段的学生一般不知道他们是真的好奇或专业人才。因此，更多的选择的学科应给予他们的比较和选择。

However, as for the second, by mentioning which I mean the postgraduate period, trainees ought to be guided to study limited areas. On one hand, a trainee in this stage has been academically mature and he, taking a mathematical expert for example, would know which subject is his life-long pursuance, topology or discreet. Thus, it would be a waste of their time and energy if teaching staff still attempt to make them weird versatile creatures arbitrarily. On the other hand, students in this phase are able to have their understanding about certain professions promptly deepened in that their interest has been fixed precisely, on the precondition that they are provided with definitely-chosen courses.
 

然而，在第二，提到，我指的是研究生期间，高分学员应当引导研究有限的区域。一方面，在这一阶段，高分学员已经成熟，他在学术上，以数学专家为例，就知道这是他毕生的追求对象，拓扑或谨慎。因此，如果教学人员仍试图让他们怪异的多功能生物随意浪费他们的时间和精力。另一方面，在这个阶段的学生都能够对某些行业的迅速加深，他们的兴趣已被精确地固定，的前提下，为他们提供明确的选择课程。

In conclusion, intensive and extensive ways of teaching do not stand against. Therefore, they must be carefully selected for the students in different spans for the purposes of firstly making trainees the men of common sense and then the men learnt afterward.
 

总之，精读与泛读的教学方式不反对。因此，必须小心的选择首先让高分学员对常识的人，那么人学会了后来的目的在不同跨度的学生。



以上就是朗阁雅思写作经典范文《学的深还是学的广》，如果您需要更多朗阁雅思范文，可随时关注我们的官方网站：济南朗阁(www.jnlongre.com)，或者直接联系我们页面上的在线客服老师，条件允许的情况下我们会尽量为您查找所要资料。